SPIVEY v. EBBERT et al
ORDER - In accord with the accompanying Memorandum 18 : 1. Pltf Mandriez Spiveys complaint 1 is DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted;2. Spiveys mtn to appoint counsel 15 is DISMISSED as moot; and3. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case. Signed by Honorable Sylvia H. Rambo on 8/2/22. (ma)
Case 1:22-cv-00596-SHR-MP Document 19 Filed 08/02/22 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
WARDEN EBBERT, et al.,
AND NOW, on this 2nd day of August 2022, for the reasons set forth in the
Memorandum accompanying this Order, IT IS ORDERED THAT:
Plaintiff Mandriez Spivey’s complaint (Doc. No. 1) is DISMISSED
with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) for failure to
state a claim upon which relief may be granted;
Spivey’s motion to appoint counsel (Doc. No. 15) is DISMISSED as
The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.
s/ Sylvia H. Rambo
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?