Corsnitz et al v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Environmental Protection et al

Filing 24

ORDER - In accord with the accompanying Memorandum 23 : 1. Dfts mtn to dismiss 5 is GRANTED;2. Pltfs claims against the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE;3. Pltfs official capacity cla ims against Dfts Andrea Blosser, Ron Ebert, Derek Enders, Felicia Lamphere, and Scott Williamson seeking money damages or other remuneration are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; and4. Pltfs official capacity claims against Dfts Blosser, Ebert, Enders, Lamphere, and Williamson seeking injunctive or declaratory relief are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Honorable Sylvia H. Rambo on 3/26/23 (ma)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA SCOTT CORSNITZ and GWENDOLYN CORSNITZ, : : : : : : : : : Plaintiffs, v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, et. al., Civil No. 22-cv-1363 Judge Sylvia H. Rambo Defendants. ORDER AND NOW, this 26th day of March, 2024, upon consideration of Defendants’ motion to dismiss (Doc. 5), and in accordance with the accompanying memorandum, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 1. Defendants’ motion to dismiss (Doc. 5) is GRANTED; 2. Plaintiffs’ claims against the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; 3. Plaintiffs’ official capacity claims against Defendants Andrea Blosser, Ron Ebert, Derek Enders, Felicia Lamphere, and Scott Williamson seeking money damages or other remuneration are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; and 4. Plaintiff’s official capacity claims against Defendants Blosser, Ebert, Enders, Lamphere, and Williamson seeking injunctive or declaratory relief are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. /s/Sylvia H. Rambo SYLVIA H. RAMBO United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?