Todd v. Luzerne County Children and Youth Services et al

Filing 225

ORDER re 224 Memorandum (Order to follow as separate docket entry) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: (1) Plaintiffs Motion to Amend/Correct Judgment to Include Interest for Eleven Years (Doc. 212) is DENIED; (2) Plaintiffs Motion to Require Defendants to File a Bond Under Rule 7 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure or, in the Alternative, to Amend Judgment (Doc. 203) is DENIED as moot; and (3) Defendants Motion to Strike Plaintiffs Motion to Amend Judgment to Include Interest for Eleven Years (Doc. 214) is DENIED as moot. Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 4/10/12. (jam, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ODETTA TODD, Plaintiff, NO. 3:04-CV-02637 v. LUZERNE COUNTY CHILDREN AND (JUDGE CAPUTO) YOUTH SERVICES and EUGENE N. CAPRIO, Defendant. ORDER NOW this 10th day of April, 2012, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: (1) Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend/Correct Judgment to Include Interest for Eleven Years (Doc. 212) is DENIED; (2) Plaintiff’s Motion to Require Defendants to File a Bond Under Rule 7 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure or, in the Alternative, to Amend Judgment (Doc. 203) is DENIED as moot; and (3) Defendants’ Motion to Strike Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend Judgment to Include Interest for Eleven Years (Doc. 214) is DENIED as moot. /s/ A. Richard Caputo A. Richard Caputo United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?