Sepulveda v. Beard et al
Filing
69
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry 68 ) - AND NOW, on the 31st day of March 2023, in accordance with the Memorandum issued concurrently with this Order, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. Petitioners amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. No. 31) is DENIED; 2. A certificate of appealability SHALL NOT ISSUE; and 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE the above-captioned case. Signed by Honorable Yvette Kane on 3/31/23. (dmn)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
MANUEL SEPULVEDA,
Petitioner
v.
LAUREL HARRY, Acting Secretary,
Pennsylvania Department of Corrections,
and MICHAEL ZAKEN, Superintendent
of the State Correctional Institution at
Greene,1
Respondents
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
No. 3:06-cv-00731
(Judge Kane)
ORDER
AND NOW, on the 31st day of March 2023, in accordance with the Memorandum issued
concurrently with this Order, IT IS ORDERED THAT:
1. Petitioner’s amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254
(Doc. No. 31) is DENIED;
2. A certificate of appealability SHALL NOT ISSUE; and
3. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE the above-captioned case.
s/ Yvette Kane
Yvette Kane, District Judge
United States District Court
Middle District of Pennsylvania
1
The Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus names as respondents John E. Wetzel,
Secretary of the Pennsylvania Department Corrections, and Robert Gilmore, Superintendent of
the State Correctional Institution at Greene. (Doc. No. 31 ¶¶ 2-3.) Mr. Wetzel has been
succeeded by Laurel Harry as Acting Secretary of Corrections. Mr. Gilmore has been succeeded
by Michael Zaken as Superintendent of the State Correctional Institution at Greene. Pursuant to
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25(d), a public officer’s successor is automatically substituted as
a party in an action brought against the public officer in an official capacity.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?