Sepulveda v. Beard et al

Filing 69

ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry 68 ) - AND NOW, on the 31st day of March 2023, in accordance with the Memorandum issued concurrently with this Order, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. Petitioners amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. No. 31) is DENIED; 2. A certificate of appealability SHALL NOT ISSUE; and 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE the above-captioned case. Signed by Honorable Yvette Kane on 3/31/23. (dmn)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MANUEL SEPULVEDA, Petitioner v. LAUREL HARRY, Acting Secretary, Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, and MICHAEL ZAKEN, Superintendent of the State Correctional Institution at Greene,1 Respondents : : : : : : : : : : : No. 3:06-cv-00731 (Judge Kane) ORDER AND NOW, on the 31st day of March 2023, in accordance with the Memorandum issued concurrently with this Order, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. Petitioner’s amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. No. 31) is DENIED; 2. A certificate of appealability SHALL NOT ISSUE; and 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE the above-captioned case. s/ Yvette Kane Yvette Kane, District Judge United States District Court Middle District of Pennsylvania 1 The Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus names as respondents John E. Wetzel, Secretary of the Pennsylvania Department Corrections, and Robert Gilmore, Superintendent of the State Correctional Institution at Greene. (Doc. No. 31 ¶¶ 2-3.) Mr. Wetzel has been succeeded by Laurel Harry as Acting Secretary of Corrections. Mr. Gilmore has been succeeded by Michael Zaken as Superintendent of the State Correctional Institution at Greene. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25(d), a public officer’s successor is automatically substituted as a party in an action brought against the public officer in an official capacity.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?