Supinski v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

Filing 298

ORDER re 297 Memorandum (Order to follow as separate docket entry) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:(1) Defendants Motion to Preclude, or in the Alternative, Limit Back Pay (Doc. 271) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows:(a) The motion is GRAN TED as to the reduction of Mr. Supinskis back pay award by the amount he received in workers compensation payments.(b) The motion is DENIED in all other respects.(2) Defendant must pay Plaintiff $342,798.40 in back pay.(3) Defendants Motion to S trike Brief in Opposition, Plaintiffs Newly Created Post-Trial Documents and Any Arguments Based Upon Them (Doc. 287) is DENIED as moot.(4) Plaintiffs Motion to Strike Motion to Strike (Doc. 296) is DENIED as moot.Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 3/6/12. (jam, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
EDWARD M. SUPINSKI,
CASE NO. 3:06-cv-00793

Plaintiff,
v.

(JUDGE CAPUTO)
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.,

Defendant.
ORDER
NOW, this

6th

day of March, 2012, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

(1) Defendant’s Motion to Preclude, or in the Alternative, Limit Back Pay (Doc. 271)
is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows:
(a) The motion is GRANTED as to the reduction of Mr. Supinski’s back pay
award by the amount he received in worker’s compensation payments.
(b) The motion is DENIED in all other respects.
(2) Defendant must pay Plaintiff $342,798.40 in back pay.
(3) Defendant’s Motion to Strike Brief in Opposition, Plaintiff’s Newly Created PostTrial Documents and Any Arguments Based Upon Them (Doc. 287) is DENIED as
moot.
(4) Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike Motion to Strike (Doc. 296) is DENIED as moot.

/s/ A. Richard Caputo
A. Richard Caputo
United States District Judge