Arlington Industries, Inc. v. Bridgeport Fittings Inc

Filing 462

ORDER - It is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Ct's order 459 gr'ng pltf's MSJ of infringment is AMENDED to read as follows: a. Pltf's MSJ 429 of infringement of claim 8 of the US Patent No. 5,266,050 by deft Bridgeport's Whipper -Snap Duplex Connectors, catalog numbers, 3838ASP & 3838SP, is GRANTED.; 2. Clrk of Ct directed to defer entry of jdgmt until conc of case.; 3. '831 patent claims remain stayed pending completin of appeal to Fed Cir.; 2. Parties to meet & confer to determine appropriate dates for remaining expt depos & ddl for anticipated MSJs on damages. (See order for complete details.) Signed by Chief Judge Christopher C. Conner on 5/16/14. (ki)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ARLINGTON INDUSTRIES, INC., Plaintiff, v. BRIDGEPORT FITTINGS, INC., Defendant : : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:06-CV-1105 (Chief Judge Conner) ORDER AND NOW, this 16th day of May, 2014, following a telephone conference held with the parties, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The court’s order (Doc. 459) granting plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment of infringement is AMENDED to read as follows: a. b. The Clerk of Court is directed to defer entry of judgment until the conclusion of the case. c. 2. Plaintiff’s motion (Doc. 429) for summary judgment of infringement of claim 8 of the United States Patent No. 5,266,050 by defendant Bridgeport Fittings, Inc.’s Whipper-Snap Duplex Connectors, catalog numbers, 3838ASP and 3838SP, is GRANTED. The ‘831 patent claims remain stayed pending completion of the appeal to the Federal Circuit. The parties are directed to meet and confer to determine appropriate dates for remaining expert depositions as well as a deadline for any anticipated motions for summary judgment on damages. /S/ CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER Christopher C. Conner, Chief Judge United States District Court Middle District of Pennsylvania

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?