Mandel v. M&Q Packaging Corp.

Filing 63

ORDER re 62 Memorandum (Order to follow as separate docket entry).IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:1.Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 27) is DENIED as to Plaintiffs Title VII hostile work environment and constructive discharge claims;2.Defendants Motion for Approval to Tax Videotaped Deposition (Doc. 42) and Plaintiffs Objections to and Motion for Review of Bill of Costs (Doc. 46) are DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE AS MOOT.Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 5/6/13. (jam)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
SHANNON J. MANDEL,
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:09-CV-0042

Plaintiff,
v.

(JUDGE CAPUTO)

M & Q PACKAGING CORP.,
Defendants.
ORDER

NOW, this 7th day of May, 2013, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1.

Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 27) is DENIED as to
Plaintiff’s Title VII hostile work environment and constructive discharge
claims;

2.

Defendant’s Motion for Approval to Tax Videotaped Deposition (Doc. 42)
and Plaintiff’s Objections to and Motion for Review of Bill of Costs (Doc.
46) are DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE AS MOOT.

/s/ A. Richard Caputo
A. Richard Caputo
United States District Judge