Reisinger v. City of Wilkes Barre et al

Filing 28

REVISED CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER granting 25 Plaintiff's Motion to Extend Time of Discovery and to File Dispositive Motions. Because Plaintiff filed a motion for enlargement of Time of discovery and to file dispositive motions on January 26, 2010 (Doc. 25); andBecause all parties do not agree on the Discovery Deadline extension proposed by Plaintiff (see Doc. 26); andBecause the deposition of Plaintiff on January 26, 2010, and the depositions of Dawn McQuaide, Ken Luck, John Popvich, Rose Ann Lesh, and Daniel Weber on January 28, 2010, could not take place due to an injury sustained by Plaintiff (see Doc. 25); andBecause discovery was scheduled to conclude on January 31, 2010 (Doc. 22); and Because the parties dispute the scope of discovery allowed in any extension (Doc. 26); andBecause certain extensions are necessary to facilitate the progress of this litigation,NOW, THEREFORE, THIS 9th DAY OF FEBRUARY 2010 THE FOLLOWING AMENDED SCHEDULE SHALL APPLY,1.As limited below, the Discovery Deadline is extended to no later than March 31, 2010;2.The Discovery Deadline extension is limited as follows: 1) during the extension period, the depositions of Plaintiff, Dawn McQuaide, Ken Luck, John Popovich, Rose Ann Lesh, and Daniel Weber, are to be conducted; and 2)the parties are allowed seven days following the final deposition to conduct discovery related to information obtained during the depositions specifically allowed by this Order;3.The Dispositive Motion Deadline is extended to May 31, 2010;4.Plaintiffs experts report will be supplied to Defendants on or before February 28, 2010;5.Defendants expert report will be supplied to Plaintiff on or before April 30, 2010;6.All other previously scheduled dates remain in effect. Signed by Honorable Richard P. Conaboy on 2/9/10 (cc, )

Reisinger v. City of Wilkes Barre et al

Doc. 28

IN THE UNTIED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JOSEPH R. REISINGER, Plaintiff, V. : :(Judge Conaboy) :

THE CITY OF WILKES-BARRE, :3:09-CV-210 et al. Defendants. : _________________________________________________________________ REVISED CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER Because Plaintiff filed a "motion for enlargement of Time of discovery and to file dispositive motions" on January 26, 2010 (Doc. 25); and Because all parties do not agree on the Discovery Deadline extension proposed by Plaintiff (see Doc. 26); and Because the deposition of Plaintiff on January 26, 2010, and the depositions of Dawn McQuaide, Ken Luck, John Popvich, Rose Ann Lesh, and Daniel Weber on January 28, 2010, could not take place due to an injury sustained by Plaintiff (see Doc. 25); and Because discovery was scheduled to conclude on January 31, 2010 (Doc. 22); and Because the parties dispute the scope of discovery allowed in any extension (Doc. 26); and Because certain extensions are necessary to facilitate the progress of this litigation,

Dockets.Justia.com

NOW, THEREFORE, THIS 9th DAY OF FEBRUARY 2010 THE FOLLOWING AMENDED SCHEDULE SHALL APPLY, 1. As limited below, the Discovery Deadline is extended to no later than March 31, 2010; 2. The Discovery Deadline extension is limited as follows: 1) during the extension period, the depositions of Plaintiff, Dawn McQuaide, Ken Luck, John Popovich, Rose Ann Lesh, and Daniel Weber, are to be conducted; and 2)the parties are allowed seven days following the final deposition to conduct discovery related to information obtained during the depositions specifically allowed by this Order; 3. 4. The Dispositive Motion Deadline is extended to May 31, 2010; Plaintiff's expert's report will be supplied to Defendants on or before February 28, 2010; 5. Defendant's expert report will be supplied to Plaintiff on or before April 30, 2010; 6. All other previously scheduled dates remain in effect.

BY THE COURT: S/Richard P. Conaboy Richard P. Conaboy United States District Judge