Reisinger v. City of Wilkes Barre et al

Filing 62

CERTIFICATE of of Service by Joseph R. Reisinger re 53 Brief in Support, 52 MOTION for Reconsideration and Certificate of Non-Concurrence. (Reisinger, Joseph)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JOSEPH R. REISINGER, Plaintiff v. THE CITY OF WILKES BARRE; THOMAS LEIGHTON; FRANCES KRATZ; GREGORY BARROUK; MICHAEL KERMEC and THE CADLE COMPANY II, INC. Defendants : : : : : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION ­ LAW JURY TRIAL DEMANDED (Honorable Richard P. Conaboy) No. 3:09-CV-210 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE JOSEPH R. REISINGER hereby certifies that on the 31st day of August, 2010 he caused to be served a true and correct copy of the Motion for Reconsideration of the Court's August 16, 2010 Order and also this Court's August 17, 2010 Order and the Brief in Support of same by electronic mail to the following: Donald H. Brobst, Esquire Rosenn, Jenkins & Greenwald 15 S. Franklin St. Wilkes-Barre, PA 18711 & Kevin T. Fogerty, Esquire Law Offices of Kevin T. Fogerty Mill Run Office Center 1275 Glenlivet Drive, Suite 150 Allentown, PA 18106 Submitted by, /s/Joseph R. Reisinger Joseph R. Reisinger IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JOSEPH R. REISINGER, Plaintiff v. THE CITY OF WILKES BARRE; THOMAS LEIGHTON; FRANCES KRATZ; GREGORY BARROUK; MICHAEL KERMEC and THE CADLE COMPANY II, INC. Defendants : : : : : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION ­ LAW JURY TRIAL DEMANDED (Honorable Richard P. Conaboy) No. 3:09-CV-210 CERTIFICATE OF NON-CONCURRENCE JOSEPH R. REISINGER hereby certifies that Donald H. Brobst, Esquire, counsel for Defendants the City of Wilkes-Barre, Thomas Leighton, Frances Kratz and Gregory Barrouk, and Kevin Fogerty, Esquire, counsel for Defendants Michael Kermec and The Cadle Company, II do not concur in this Motion. Submitted by, /s/Joseph R. Reisinger Joseph R. Reisinger

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?