Sabric et al v. Lockheed Martin et al

Filing 64

ORDER re 63 Memorandum (Order to follow as separate docket entry), ORDER DISMISSING CASE. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant U.S. Security Associates Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 46) is GRANTED. It is further ORDERED that Defendant Lockheed Martins Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 37) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. (1) Lockheed Martins Motion for Summary Judgment on Plaintiffs claims is GRANTED. (2) Lockheed Martins Motion for Summary Judgment on its cross-claim for indemnification and reimbursement against U.S. Security Associates, Inc. is DENIED. The Clerk of Court is directed to mark the case as CLOSED.Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 5/30/12. (jam, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
ANDREW SABRIC and GENEVIEVE
SABRIC, CO-EXECUTORS of the

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:09-2237

ESTATE OF DEBORAH BACHAK
(JUDGE CAPUTO)

Plaintiffs,
v.
LOCKHEED MARTIN and U.S.
SECURITY ASSOCIATES, INC.
Defendants.
ORDER

NOW, this 30th day of May, 2012, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant U.S.
Security Associate’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 46) is GRANTED. It is further
ORDERED that Defendant Lockheed Martin’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 37) is
GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.
(1) Lockheed Martin’s Motion for Summary Judgment on Plaintiffs’ claims is
GRANTED.
(2) Lockheed Martin’s Motion for Summary Judgment on its cross-claim for
indemnification and reimbursement against U.S. Security Associates, Inc. is
DENIED.

The Clerk of Court is directed to mark the case as CLOSED.

/s/ A. Richard Caputo
A. Richard Caputo
United States District Judge