Nolen Scott Ely, et al v. Cabot Oil & Gas Corporation and Gassearch Drilling Services Corproation
Filing
800
ORDER - 1. Cabots motion for judgment as a matter of law pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 50(b) is DENIED; 2. Cabots motion for a new trial pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 59 is GRANTED; 3. The parties shall be required to engage in further settlement proceed ings prior to a new trial; 4. If settlement proceedings are unsuccessful at resolving the plaintiffs remaining claims, a new jury trial shall be set; and 5. A further pretrial scheduling Order shall issue separately. Signed by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson on March 31, 2017. (kjn)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
NOLEN SCOTT ELY, et al.,
Plaintiffs
v.
CABOT OIL & GAS
CORPORATION, et al.,
Defendants
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
Civil No. 3:09-CV-2284
(Magistrate Judge Carlson)
ORDER
AND NOW, this 31st day of March 2017, upon consideration of the
defendant’s motion for judgment as a matter of law, alternatively for a new trial, or
for remittitur (Doc. 756.); and upon consideration of the parties’ briefs and the
record taken of the trial proceedings; and for the reasons fully explained in the
Court’s memorandum and opinion that accompanies this Order, IT IS HEREBY
ORDERED THAT:
1.
Cabot’s motion for judgment as a matter of law pursuant to Fed. R.
Civ. P. 50(b) is DENIED;
2.
Cabot’s motion for a new trial pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 59 is
GRANTED;
3.
The parties shall be required to engage in further settlement
proceedings prior to a new trial;
4.
If settlement proceedings are unsuccessful at resolving the plaintiffs’
remaining claims, a new jury trial shall be set; and
5.
A further pretrial scheduling Order shall issue separately.
/s/ Martin C. Carlson
Martin C. Carlson
United States Magistrate Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?