Hammond et al v. City of Wilkes-Barre et al

Filing 120

ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry)(1)Defendants motion for summary judgment, (Doc. 98), is GRANTED;(2)Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment, (Doc. 99), is DENIED;(3)Plaintiffs §1983 claims against Leo Glodzik III are D ISMISSED;(4)Plaintiffs state law claims are DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1367(c)(3);(5)Defendants motion to strike, (Doc. 111), is DISMISSED, (6)The Clerk is directed to enter judgment for defendants, and;(7)The Clerk is directed to close the case.Signed by Honorable Malachy E Mannion on 6/5/14. (bs)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
TYLER HAMMOND and
ANTONIA HAMMOND,

:
:

Plaintiffs

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:09-2310
:

v.

(JUDGE MANNION)
:

CITY OF WILKES-BARRE et al.,
:
Defendants
ORDER
In light of today’s memorandum, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
(1)

Defendants’ motion for summary judgment, (Doc. 98), is
GRANTED;

(2)

Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment, (Doc. 99), is DENIED;

(3)

Plaintiffs’ §1983 claims against Leo Glodzik III are DISMISSED;

(4)

Plaintiffs’ state law claims are DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§1367(c)(3);

(5)

Defendants’ motion to strike, (Doc. 111), is DISMISSED,

(6)

The Clerk is directed to enter judgment for defendants, and;

(7)

The Clerk is directed to close the case.

s/ Malachy E. Mannion
MALACHY E. MANNION
United States District Judge
Date: June 5, 2014
O:\Mannion\shared\MEMORANDA - DJ\CIVIL MEMORANDA\2009 MEMORANDA\09-2310-01-order.wpd