Williams v. Walsh et al

Filing 42

ORDER : IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The petition for writ of habeas corpus 9Doc. 1) is DENIED. 2. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case. 3. There is no basis for the issuance of a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c).Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 6/23/14. (jam)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
SAMUEL DYWAYNE WILLIAMS,
Petitioner
v.
JEROME WALSH, et al.,
Respondents

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL NO. 3:CV-09-2479
(Judge Caputo)

ORDER
AND NOW, THIS 23rd DAY OF JUNE, 2014, upon consideration of the
petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. 1), and for the
reasons set forth in the memorandum issued on this date, IT IS HEREBY
ORDERED THAT:
1.

The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) is
DENIED.

2.

The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.

3.

There is no basis for the issuance of a certificate of
appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c).

/s/ A. Richard Caputo
A. RICHARD CAPUTO
United States District Judge