Vaskas et al v. Motor Truck Equipment - Pittsburgh, Inc. et al

Filing 26

ORDER re 25 Memorandum (Order to follow as separate docket entry),, Motions terminated: 13 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Paccar, Inc., Kenworth Truck Co., 18 First MOTION to Supplement the Record filed by Dean na Vaskas, Robert Vaskas. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:1.Plaintiffs Motion to Supplement (Doc. 18) is GRANTED;2.Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 13) is GRANTED as to Plaintiffs claims for breach of warranty, strict liability design defect, and strict liability failure to warn;3.Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 13) is DENIED as to Plaintiffs claims for negligence and strict liability manufacturing defect. Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 1/8/13. (jam)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
ROBERT and DEANNA VASKAS,
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:10-CV-1024

Plaintiffs,
v.

(JUDGE CAPUTO)

KENWORTH TRUCK CO. and PACCAR,
INC.,
Defendants.
ORDER

NOW, this 8th day of January, 2013, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1.

Plaintiffs’ Motion to Supplement (Doc. 18) is GRANTED;

2.

Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 14) is GRANTED as to
Plaintiffs’ claims for breach of warranty, strict liability design defect, and strict
liability failure to warn;

3.

Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 14) is DENIED as to
Plaintiffs’ claims for negligence and strict liability manufacturing defect.

/s/ A. Richard Caputo
A. Richard Caputo
United States District Judge