Thorpe v. Borough of Jim Thorpe et al
Filing
89
ORDER re 88 Memorandum (Order to follow as separate docket entry): IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Borough of Jim Thorpe's Motion to Permissively Allow Lineal Descendants of Decedent to Join in this Matter and Participate with Court Ord ered Mediation (Doc. 82) and Defendant Borough of Jim Thorpe's Amended Motion to Permissively Allow Lineal Descendants of Decedent to Join in this Mattter and Participate with Court Ordered Mediation (Doc. 85) are DENIED. Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 9/28/12. (jam, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
JOHN THORPE, RICHARD THORPE,
WILLIAM THORPE, and the SAC and
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:CV-10-1317
FOX NATION OF OKLAHOMA,
(JUDGE CAPUTO)
Plaintiffs,
v.
BOROUGH OF JIM THORPE, MICHAEL
SOFRANKO, RONALD CONFER, JOHN
MCGUIRE, JOSEPH MARZEN, W. TODD
MASON, JEREMY MELBER, JUSTIN
YAICH, JOSEPH KREBS, GREG
STRUBINGER, KYLE SHECKLER, and
JOANA KLITSCH,
Defendants.
ORDER
NOW, this 28th day of September, 2012, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that
Defendant Borough of Jim Thorpe’s Motion to Permissively Allow Lineal Descendants of
Decedent to Join in this Matter and Participate with Court Ordered Mediation (Doc. 82)
and Defendant Borough of Jim Thorpe’s Amended Motion to Permissively Allow Lineal
Descendants of Decedent to Join in this Matter and Participate with Court Ordered
Mediation (Doc. 85) are DENIED.
/s/ A. Richard Caputo
A. Richard Caputo
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?