Keys v. Carroll et al

Filing 166

ORDER re 165 Memorandum (Order to follow as separate docket entry),, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:1.Parties are Directed to submit a Case Management Order within fourteen (14) days of this Order. 2.Parties Motions for Extension of Discovery Deadlines (Doc. 95 and 96) are deemed MOOT. 3.Plaintiffs Motion to Suppress the Use of Depositions by Defendants (Doc. 129) is deemed WITHDRAWN.4.Plaintiffs Motion to Stay Depositions and Compel Legal Materials (Doc. 47) is deemed MOOT. 5.Plaintiffs Motion to Compel Defendants Walsh, Mooney, Klopotoski and Zakarauskas to Answer Plaintiffs Request for Admissions and Interrogatories (Doc. 71) is GRANTED. 6.Plaintiffs Motions to Compel Discovery (Docs. 41, 59, 100 and 127) are GRANTED IN PART. The Corre ctions Defendants are directed to produce materials in a manner consistent with Part I of the accompanying Memorandum. Insofar as these motions seek monetary sanctions, they are DENIED. 7.Plaintiffs Motion for Sanctions against Defendant Fedor for Failure to Disclose (Doc. 138) is GRANTED IN PART. Defendant Fedor is directed to respond to the two interrogatories in a manner consistent with Part II of the accompanying Memorandum. Insofar as this Motion seeks monetary sanctions, it is DENIED. Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 2/22/12. (jam, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

CARRINGTON KEYS,
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:10-CV-1570
Plaintiff,
(JUDGE CAPUTO)
JACQUELINE CARROLL, et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER
NOW, this 22nd day of February, 2012, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1.

Parties are Directed to submit a Case Management Order within fourteen
(14) days of this Order.

2.

Parties’ Motions for Extension of Discovery Deadlines (Doc. 95 and 96)
are deemed MOOT.

3.

Plaintiff’s Motion to Suppress the Use of Depositions by Defendants
(Doc. 129) is deemed WITHDRAWN.

4.

Plaintiff’s Motion to Stay Depositions and Compel Legal Materials (Doc.
47) is deemed MOOT.

5.

Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Defendants Walsh, Mooney, Klopotoski and
Zakarauskas to Answer Plaintiff’s Request for Admissions and
Interrogatories (Doc. 71) is GRANTED.

6.

Plaintiff’s Motions to Compel Discovery (Docs. 41, 59, 100 and 127) are
GRANTED IN PART. The Corrections Defendants are directed to
produce materials in a manner consistent with Part I of the
accompanying Memorandum. Insofar as these motions seek monetary
sanctions, they are DENIED.

7.

Plaintiff’s Motion for Sanctions against Defendant Fedor for Failure to
Disclose (Doc. 138) is GRANTED IN PART. Defendant Fedor is directed
to respond to the two interrogatories in a manner consistent with Part II of
the accompanying Memorandum. Insofar as this Motion seeks monetary
sanctions, it is DENIED.

/s/ A. Richard Caputo
A. Richard Caputo
United States District Judge

2