Keys v. Carroll et al

Filing 215

ORDER re 214 Memorandum (Order to follow as separate docket entry) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1.Plaintiffs Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. 194) is DENIED;2.Plaintiffs Motion to Stay Consideration of Defendants Motion for Summary Judgme nt (Doc. 192) is DENIED.3.Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 188) is GRANTED as to Defendants Beard, Klopotoski, Walsh, Mooney, Zakarauskas, Elmore, Angelovic, and Fedor.4.Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 188) is DENIED as to Defendants Pudlosky and McCoy. Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 9/26/12. (jam, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

CARRINGTON ALAN KEYS,
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:10-cv-1570
Plaintiff,
(JUDGE CAPUTO)

v.
DISTRICT ATTORNEY JACQUELINE M.
CARROLL, et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER

NOW, this 26th day of September, 2012, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1.

Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. 194) is DENIED;

2.

Plaintiff’s Motion to Stay Consideration of Defendants’ Motion for Summary
Judgment (Doc. 192) is DENIED.

3.

Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 188) is GRANTED as to
Defendants Beard, Klopotoski, Walsh, Mooney, Zakarauskas, Elmore,
Angelovic, and Fedor.

4.

Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 188) is DENIED as to
Defendants Pudlosky and McCoy.

/s/ A. Richard Caputo
A. Richard Caputo
United States District Judge