Cosby v. Magnotta et al

Filing 86

ORDER 1. Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 52) is DENIED. 2.Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 62) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, to wit: a. The Motion is GRANTED as to Count II (Unlawful Search) of Plaintiffs Secon d Amended Complaint. b. The Motion is DENIED as to Count I (Unlawful Seizure), Count III (Conspiracy), and Count VII (Supervisory Liability) of Plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint. 3. The case will be scheduled for trial on Counts I, III, and VII. Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 2/24/14. (jfg)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

PAUL W. COSBY, M.D.,

Plaintiff,
3:10-CV-01881

v.
(JUDGE MARIANI)
RENEE MAGNOTTA, et at,
Defendants.
ORDER
AND NOW, THIs)'f~ DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2014, in accordance with the
Court's Memorandum Opinion, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1. Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 52) is DENIED.
2. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 62) is GRANTED IN PART and
DENIED IN PART, to wit:
a. The Motion is GRANTED as to Count II (Unlawful Search) of Plaintiffs
Second Amended Complaint.
b. The Motion is DENIED as to Count I (Unlawful Seizure), Count III
(Conspiracy), and Count VII (Supervisory Liability) of Plaintiffs Second
Amended Complaint.
3. The case will be scheduled for trial on Counts I, III, and VII.

2