Hanczyc v. Valley Distributing and Storage Company, Inc. et al

Filing 71

ORDER re 70 Memorandum (Order to follow as separate docket entry), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:(1)Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 25) is DENIED.(2)Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 33) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment as to liability on his Fair Labor Standards Act (Count VI) and Pennsylvania Minimum Wage Act (Count VII) claims is GRANTED, but the issue of damages is reserved for trial. Plaintiffs motion is DENIED in all other respects.Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 9/7/12. (jam, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
STANLEY J. HANCZYC, JR.
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:CV-10-2397

Plaintiff,

(JUDGE CAPUTO)

v.
VALLEY DISTRIBUTING AND STORAGE
COMPANY, INC., CONRAD
KOTLOWSKI, and CAROL KEUP,
Defendants.
ORDER

NOW, this 7th day of September, 2012, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
(1)

Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 25) is DENIED.

(2)

Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 33) is GRANTED in part
and DENIED in part. Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment as to liability
on his Fair Labor Standards Act (Count VI) and Pennsylvania Minimum
Wage Act (Count VII) claims is GRANTED, but the issue of damages is
reserved for trial. Plaintiff’s motion is DENIED in all other respects.

/s/ A. Richard Caputo
A. Richard Caputo
United States District Judge