Elsevier Inc. et al v. Comprehensive Microfilm & Scanning Services, Inc. et al

Filing 152

ORDER 1. Defendants' Motion to Compel Anthony DeStephen's presence at trial (Doc. 147) is DENIED. 2. Defendants' alternative oral request for a third deposition of Anthony DeStephens is DENIED. 3. The two deposition transcripts of Anth ony DeStephens that have been taken to date may be ADMITTED at trial in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 32(a){4)(C). 4. To the extent that there remain any unresolved objections to any portion of the DeStephen deposition transcripts, it is further ORDERED that the parties bring such objections to the attention of the COLirt before using the transcripts at trial.Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 10/128/13. (jfg)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
ELSEVIER, INC., et al.,
Plaintiffs,

v.

3:10-CV-02S13
(JUDGE MARIANI)

COMPREHENSIVE MICROFILM &
SCANNING SERVICES, INC., et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER
AND NOW, THIS 28TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2013, in accordance with the
Court's Memorandum Opinion, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1. Defendants' Motion to Compel Anthony DeStephen's presence at trial (Doc. 147)
is DENIED.
2. Defendants' alternative oral request for a third deposition of Anthony DeStephens
is DENIED.
3. The two deposition transcripts of Anthony DeStephens that have been taken to
date may be ADMITTED at trial in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 32(a){4)(C).
4. To the extent that there remain any unresolved objections to any portion of the
DeStephen deposition transcripts, it is further ORDERED that the parties bring
such objections to the attention of the COLirt before using the transcripts at trial.

I
)

:

Robert D. Mariani
United States District Judge

2