Bidlack et al v. Chesapeake Appalachia, LLC et al

Filing 25

ORDER re 24 Memorandum (Order to follow as separate docket entry), Memorandum (Order to follow as separate docket entry), Memorandum (Order to follow as separate docket entry), Motions terminated: 13 MOTION Plaintiffs' Motion for Relief from the Court's Order to Stay Pending Arbitration re 8 Order on Motion to Stay filed by Edwin Bidlack, Candy D. Bidlack, 16 MOTION for Hearing re 13 MOTION Plaintiffs' Motion for Relief from the Court's Order to Stay Pending Arbitra tion re 8 Order on Motion to Stay MOTION for Hearing re 13 MOTION Plaintiffs' Motion for Relief from the Court's Order to Stay Pending Arbitration re 8 Order on Motion to Stay filed by Nomac Drilling, LLC, Chesapeake Energy Corporatio n, Chesapeake Appalachia, LLC. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:(1) Plaintiffs Motion for Relief from the Courts Order to Stay Pending Arbitration (Doc. 13) is DENIED.(2) Defendants Motion for an Evidentiary Hearing and for Leave to Conduct Limited Pre-Hearing Discovery (Doc. 16) is DENIED as moot.(3) The action is STAYED until arbitration is completed.Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 5/11/12. (jam, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA EDWIN BIDLACK, CANDY D. BIDLACK, and JESSIE LEE NORTHRUP, CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:11-0129 individually, (JUDGE CAPUTO) Plaintiffs, v. CHESAPEAKE APPALACHIA, LLC, CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORPORATION, and NOMAC DRILLING, LLC, Defendants. MEMORANDUM NOW, this 11th day of May, 2012, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: (1) Plaintiffs’ Motion for Relief from the Court’s Order to Stay Pending Arbitration (Doc. 13) is DENIED. (2) Defendants’ Motion for an Evidentiary Hearing and for Leave to Conduct Limited Pre-Hearing Discovery (Doc. 16) is DENIED as moot. (3) The action is STAYED until arbitration is completed. /s/ A. Richard Caputo A. Richard Caputo United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?