Hinkley v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole et al

Filing 50

ORDER re 49 Memorandum (Order to follow as separate docket entry), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: (1) The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 34) is ADOPTED. (2) Plaintiff's Petition for R.O.R. Bail Nature of Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 28) is DISMIS SED. (3) Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed with Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus In Forma Pauperis (Doc. 29) is DENIED. (4) the case is RECOMITTED to Magistrate Judge Mannion for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 3/26/12. (jam, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
RANDY CARL HINKLEY,
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:11-0525

Plaintiff,
v.

(JUDGE CAPUTO)
PENNSYLVANIA BOARD of PROBATION

(MAGISTRATE JUDGE MANNION)

& PAROLE, et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER
NOW, this 26th day of March, 2012, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
(1)

The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 34) is ADOPTED.

(2)

Plaintiff’s Petition for R.O.R. Bail Nature of Writ of Habeas Corpus
(Doc. 28) is DISMISSED.

(3)

Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Proceed with Petition for Writ of
Habeas Corpus In Forma Pauperis (Doc. 29) is DENIED.

(4)

The case is RECOMMITTED to Magistrate Judge Mannion for further
proceedings.

/s/ A. Richard Caputo
A. Richard Caputo
United States District Judge