Rittenhouse Entertainment, Inc. et al v. City of Wilkes-Barre et al
Filing
57
ORDER re 56 Memorandum (Order to follow as separate docket entry). IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion for Reconsideration by Defendants Luzerne County and Michael Savokinas (Doc. 33) is DENIED. Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 6/4/12. (jam, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
RITTENHOUSE ENTERTAINMENT,
INC.; THE MINES, INC.; G NET COMM.
CO.; PHOENIX ESTATES; and
THOMAS J. GRECO;
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:11-CV-617
(JUDGE CAPUTO)
Plaintiffs,
v.
CITY OF WILKES-BARRE; THOMAS
LEIGHTON, individually and as Mayor of
Wilkes-Barre; GERALD DESSOYE,
individually and as Chief of Police of
Wilkes-Barre; J.J. MURPHY, individually
and as City Administrator of WilkesBarre; TONY THOMAS, JR., KATHY
KANE, WILLIAM BARRET, RICK
CRONAUER, and MICHAEL MERRITT,
individually and as Members of the
Wilkes-Barre City Council; BUTCH
FRATI, individually and as Director of
Operations of Wilkes-Barre; LUZERNE
COUNTY; MICHAEL SAVOKINAS,
individually and as Luzerne County
Sheriff; KING’S COLLEGE; and FATHER
THOMAS J. O’HARA, ROBERT
MCGONIGLE, PAUL LINDENMUTH, and
JOHN MCANDREW, individually and as
Officers and Employees of Kings
College;
Defendants.
ORDER
NOW, this 4th
day of June, 2012, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the
Motion for Reconsideration by Defendants Luzerne County and Michael Savokinas
(Doc. 33) is DENIED.
/s/ A. Richard Caputo
A. Richard Caputo
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?