Rittenhouse Entertainment, Inc. et al v. City of Wilkes-Barre et al

Filing 57

ORDER re 56 Memorandum (Order to follow as separate docket entry). IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion for Reconsideration by Defendants Luzerne County and Michael Savokinas (Doc. 33) is DENIED. Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 6/4/12. (jam, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA RITTENHOUSE ENTERTAINMENT, INC.; THE MINES, INC.; G NET COMM. CO.; PHOENIX ESTATES; and THOMAS J. GRECO; CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:11-CV-617 (JUDGE CAPUTO) Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF WILKES-BARRE; THOMAS LEIGHTON, individually and as Mayor of Wilkes-Barre; GERALD DESSOYE, individually and as Chief of Police of Wilkes-Barre; J.J. MURPHY, individually and as City Administrator of WilkesBarre; TONY THOMAS, JR., KATHY KANE, WILLIAM BARRET, RICK CRONAUER, and MICHAEL MERRITT, individually and as Members of the Wilkes-Barre City Council; BUTCH FRATI, individually and as Director of Operations of Wilkes-Barre; LUZERNE COUNTY; MICHAEL SAVOKINAS, individually and as Luzerne County Sheriff; KING’S COLLEGE; and FATHER THOMAS J. O’HARA, ROBERT MCGONIGLE, PAUL LINDENMUTH, and JOHN MCANDREW, individually and as Officers and Employees of Kings College; Defendants. ORDER NOW, this 4th day of June, 2012, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion for Reconsideration by Defendants Luzerne County and Michael Savokinas (Doc. 33) is DENIED. /s/ A. Richard Caputo A. Richard Caputo United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?