Fattah v. PA Board of Probation & Parole et al

Filing 31

ORDER re 30 Memorandum (Order to follow as separate docket entry): IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:(1)The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 25) is ADOPTED.(2)The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1) is DENIED.(3)The Motion to Expedite (Doc. 5) is DE NIED as moot.(4)The Motion for Reconsideration (Doc. 27) of the Courts Order denying Petitioners Motion to Appoint Counsel is DENIED as moot.(5)The Clerk of Court is directed to mark the case as CLOSED. Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 3/26/12. (jam, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ABDEL FATTAH, CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:11-985 Petitioner, (JUDGE CAPUTO) v. (MAGISTRATE JUDGE BLEWITT) PENNSYLVANIA BOARD of PROBATION & PAROLE, et al., Respondents. ORDER NOW, this 26th day of March, 2012, after consideration of the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 25) of Magistrate Judge Blewitt to Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: (1) The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 25) is ADOPTED. (2) The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1) is DENIED. (3) The Motion to Expedite (Doc. 5) is DENIED as moot. (4) The Motion for Reconsideration (Doc. 27) of the Court’s Order denying Petitioner’s Motion to Appoint Counsel is DENIED as moot. (5) The Clerk of Court is directed to mark the case as CLOSED. /s/ A. Richard Caputo A. Richard Caputo United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?