Williams v. Exeter Township et al

Filing 12

ORDER re 11 Memorandum (Order to follow as separate docket entry): IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:(1)Defendants Partial Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Complaint (Doc. 3) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.(2)Plaintiffs Pennsylvania Whistleblower Act cl aim is DISMISSED without prejudice. Plaintiff is given leave to amend the Complaint within twenty-one (21) days of this Order to cure the deficiencies identified in the accompanying Memorandum. If Plaintiff fails to timely amend his Complaint, Defendants may move the Court to dismiss the Pennsylvania Whistleblower Act claim with prejudice.Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 3/26/12. (jam, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
NEIL WILLIAMS,
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:11-CV-1931
Plaintiff,
(JUDGE CAPUTO)

v.
EXETER TOWNSHIP, et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER

NOW, this 26th day of March, 2012, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
(1)

Defendants’ Partial Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint (Doc. 3) is
GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.

(2)

Plaintiff’s Pennsylvania Whistleblower Act claim is DISMISSED without
prejudice. Plaintiff is given leave to amend the Complaint within twentyone (21) days of this Order to cure the deficiencies identified in the
accompanying Memorandum. If Plaintiff fails to timely amend his Complaint,
Defendants may move the Court to dismiss the Pennsylvania Whistleblower
Act claim with prejudice.

/s/ A. Richard Caputo
A. Richard Caputo
United States District Judge