Etheredge v. Henry et al

Filing 47

ORDER 1. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint (Doc. 41) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. a. Plaintiffs gender-based Equal Protection claim is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. b. All facts arising before March 2008 in support of Plainti ffs sole remaining claim of an Equal Protection violation based on his sexual orientation are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. i. Accordingly, Defendants' motion to dismiss Plaintiffs Equal Protection claim based on sexual orientation is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. c. Additionally, Defendants' motion to dismiss for lack of personal involvement isDENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 1/6/14. (jfg)

Download PDF
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JAMES ETHEREDGE Plaintiff v. 3:11·CV·2330 (JUDGE MARIANI) M.L. HENRY, et al., Defendants ORDER AND NOW, THIS 6TH DAY OF JANUARY 2014, upon consideration of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint (Doc. 41) and all accompanying briefs, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint (Doc. 41) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. a. Plaintiffs gender-based Equal Protection claim is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. b. All facts arising before March 2008 in support of Plaintiffs sole remaining claim of an Equal Protection violation based on his sexual orientation are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. i. Accordingly, Defendants' motion to dismiss Plaintiffs Equal Protection claim based on sexual orientation is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. c. Additionally, Defendants' motion to dismiss for lack of personal involvement is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?