Dansbury et al v. EOG Resources, Inc.

Filing 61

ORDER upon consideration of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint (Doc. 52), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT such Motion is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, to wit: 1. The references to the original and First Revise d Unit Designations are STRICKEN from Count II; 2. Count VI is WITHDRAWN by request of the Plaintiffs; and 3. With the exception of the modifications ordered above, the Third Amended Complaint SHALL CONSTITUTE the operative and final Complaint in this action. No further amendments will be permitted without leave of court. Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 1/29/15. (jfg)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

ARTHUR M. DANSBURY, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

3:12-CV-00391
(JUDGE MARIANI)

EOG RESOURCES, INC.,

Defendant.
ORDER
AND NOW, THIS 29TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2014, upon consideration of
Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint (Doc. 52), IT IS
HEREBY ORDERED THAT such Motion is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, to
wit:
1. The references to the original and First Revised Unit Designations are STRICKEN
from Count II;
2. Count VI is WITHDRAWN by request of the Plaintiffs; and
3. With the exception of the modifications ordered above, the Third Amended
Complaint SHALL CONSTITUTE the operative and final Complaint in this action. No
further amendments will be permitted without leave of court.

2