Brown et al v. Smith et al

Filing 66

ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry). IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AS FOLLOWS: 1. Any decision with respect to Plaintiff's motion to compel discovery (Doc.54) is stayed pending resolution of Defendants' motion seeking summ ary judgment on the basis of failure to exhause administrative remedies. 2. Within twenty one (21) days from the date of this order, Plaintiff shall file a supplement to his brief in opposition to Defendants' summary judgment motion addressing the failure to exhaust argument.Signed by Honorable Edwin M. Kosik on 4/10/15. (ga)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

RICHARD BROWN,
Plaintiff
v.
KEVIN SMITH, et al.,
Defendants

:
:
:
:
: CIVIL NO. 3:CV-12-0446
:
: (Judge Kosik)
:
:

ORDER
AND NOW, THIS 10th DAY OF APRIL, 2015, in accordance with the
accompanying Memorandum, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AS FOLLOWS:
1.

Any decision with respect to Plaintiff’s motion to compel discovery
(Doc. 54) is stayed pending resolution of Defendants’ motion seeking
summary judgment on the basis of failure to exhaust administrative
remedies.

2.

Within twenty (21) days from the date of this order, Plaintiff shall file a
supplement to his brief in opposition to Defendants’ summary judgment
motion addressing the failure to exhaust argument.

s/Edwin M. Kosik
EDWIN M. KOSIK
United States District Judge