Calhoun et al v. Van Loon et al

Filing 45

ORDER - upon consideration of Defendants Stephen Van Loon and New Prime, Inc. d/b/a Prime, Inc.'s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. 35), and all accompanying briefs, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Defendants' motion is GRANTED; to wit: 1 . Summary judgment is entered in favor of Defendants with respect to Count II (Negligence by New Prime, Inc), Count III (Punitive Damages against Van Loon), and Count III (Punitive Damages against New Prime, Inc.). 2. The case will be scheduled for trial on Counts I, V, and VI.Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 7/11/14. (jfg)

Download PDF
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA i I I [ HENRY CALHOUN, and TANYA CALHOUN Plaintiffs v. \ I I ! I I 3:12·CV·458 (JUDGE MARIANI) ! ! STEPHEN VAN LOON, and NEW PRIME, INC. f , ! r , Defendants ORDER AND NOW, THIS !l!!DAY OF JULY 2014, upon consideration of Defendants Stephen Van Loon and New Prime, Inc. d/b/a Prime, Inc.'s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. 35), and all accompanying briefs, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Defendants' motion is GRANTED; to wit: 1. Summary judgment is entered in favor of Defendants with respect to Count II (Negligence by New Prime, Inc), Count III (Punitive Damages against Van Loon), and Count III (Punitive Damages against New Prime, Inc.). 2. The case will be scheduled for trial on Counts I, V, and VI. • ob nan! United States District Court Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?