Sarnoski v. Scranton Police Dept. et al

Filing 12

ORDER re 11 Memorandum (Order to follow as separate docket entry), ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:(1) Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. 2) is GRANTED.(2) Magistrate Judge Carlsons Report and Recommendation to Plaintiffs Complaint (Doc. 5) is REJECTED in part and ADOPTED IN PART. The Recommendation to dismiss Plaintiffs claims is ADOPTED. The Recommendation to dismiss the action is REJECTED. Plaintiff may fil e an amended complaint within a time period to be established by the Magistrate Judge. If Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint within this time period, her claims will be dismissed without prejudice. (3)The matter is RECOMMITTED to Magistrate Judge Carlson for further proceedings.Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 6/12/12. (jam, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
KRISTEN SARNOSKI,
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:12-0503

Plaintiff,

(JUDGE CAPUTO)

v.

(MAGISTRATE JUDGE CARLSON)

SCRANTON POLICE DEPARTMENT,
et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER

NOW, this 12th day of June, 2012, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
(1)

Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. 2) is
GRANTED.

(2)

Magistrate Judge Carlson’s Report and Recommendation to Plaintiff’s
Complaint (Doc. 5) is REJECTED in part and ADOPTED IN PART. The
Recommendation to dismiss Plaintiff’s claims is ADOPTED.

The

Recommendation to dismiss the action is REJECTED. Plaintiff may file an
amended complaint within a time period to be established by the Magistrate
Judge. If Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint within this time period,
her claims will be dismissed without prejudice.
(3)

The matter is RECOMMITTED to Magistrate Judge Carlson for further
proceedings.

/s/ A. Richard Caputo
A. Richard Caputo
United States District Judge