Mincy v. Luzerne County Pennsylvania et al
Filing
342
ORDER 1. Plaintiffs Objections, (Docs 328, 332), are OVERRULED. 2. The Report and Recommendation, (Doc. 327), is ADOPTED for the reasons stated therein. 3. Plaintiffs Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, (Doc. 218), is DENIED. 4.Defendant's Motion for Surnmary Judgment, (Doc. 285), is GRANTED. 5. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 3/30/17. (jfg)
t
I
~
i
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
HILTON KARRIEM MINCY,
(
!
Plaintiff,
v.
3:12-CV-00608
(JUDGE MARIANI)
LUZERNE COUNTY, et al.
I
I
Defendants.
ORDER
AND NOW, THI@
I
~AY OF MARCH, 2017, upon de novo review of the Report
f
t
t
f
f
and Recommendation issued by Magistrate Judge Mehalchick, (Doc. 327), and Plaintiffs
Objections thereto, (Docs 328, 332), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
I
!
I
f
1. Plaintiffs Objections, (Docs 328, 332), are OVERRULED.
I
2. The Report and Recommendation, (Doc. 327), is ADOPTED for the reasons
i
t
!
stated therein.
t
3. Plaintiffs Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, (Doc. 218), is DENIED.
4. Defendant's Motion for Surnmary Judgment, (Doc. 285), is GRANTED.
5. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.
Robert D. Mariani
United States District Judge
1
I
I
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?