Mincy v. Luzerne County Pennsylvania et al

Filing 342

ORDER 1. Plaintiffs Objections, (Docs 328, 332), are OVERRULED. 2. The Report and Recommendation, (Doc. 327), is ADOPTED for the reasons stated therein. 3. Plaintiffs Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, (Doc. 218), is DENIED. 4.Defendant's Motion for Surnmary Judgment, (Doc. 285), is GRANTED. 5. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 3/30/17. (jfg)

t

I
~

i

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
HILTON KARRIEM MINCY,

(
!

Plaintiff,

v.

3:12-CV-00608

(JUDGE MARIANI)

LUZERNE COUNTY, et al.

I

I

Defendants.
ORDER

AND NOW, THI@

I

~AY OF MARCH, 2017, upon de novo review of the Report

f

t

t
f
f

and Recommendation issued by Magistrate Judge Mehalchick, (Doc. 327), and Plaintiffs
Objections thereto, (Docs 328, 332), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

I
!

I
f

1. Plaintiffs Objections, (Docs 328, 332), are OVERRULED.

I

2. The Report and Recommendation, (Doc. 327), is ADOPTED for the reasons

i

t
!

stated therein.

t
3. Plaintiffs Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, (Doc. 218), is DENIED.
4. Defendant's Motion for Surnmary Judgment, (Doc. 285), is GRANTED.
5. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.

Robert D. Mariani
United States District Judge

1

I

I