Cardona v. Bledsoe

Filing 27

ORDER 1. The motion (Doc. 22) is GRANTED. 2. The brief (Doc. 23) in opposition to Petitioner's motion for reconsideration is ACCEPTED as filed and DEEMED timely filed.Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 4/24/17. (jfg)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

JOSE CARDONA,

Civil No. 3:12-cv-820

Petitioner

(Judge Mariani)

v.
B.A. BLEDSOE,
Respondent

.

AND NOW, this

ORDER

d-r{~ay of April, 2017, upon consideration of Respondent's

motion (Doc. 22) to submit nunc pro tunc a brief in opposition to Petitioner's motion for
reconsideration, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1.

The motion (Doc. 22) is GRANTED.

2.

The brief (Doc. 23) in opposition to Petitioner's motion for reconsideration is

ACCEPTED as filed and DEEMED timely filed.