Lakkis v. Lahovski et al

Filing 55

ORDER 1. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 41) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. a. Count I (Plaintiffs First Amendment retaliation claim), Count II (constitutional challenge to Special Order Memorandum), and Count III (§ 1983 conspi racy), are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 2. Defendants' motion to dismiss paragraphs 51 through 56 in support of Count IV (Plaintiffs subsequent First Amendment retaliation claim) and Count IV itself is DENIED.Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 1/30/14. (jfg)

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

PETER LAKKIS

Plaintiff

v.

3:12·CV·1024
(JUDGE MARIANI)

FREDERICK LAHOVSKI and
JOECHACKE
Defendants

ORDER
AND NOW, THIS 30 TH DAY OF JANUARY 2014, upon consideration of
Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 41) and all accompanying briefs, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED THAT:
1. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 41) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN

PART.
a. Count I (Plaintiffs First Amendment retaliation claim), Count II (constitutional
challenge to Special Order Memorandum), and Count III (§ 1983 conspiracy),
are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
2. Defendants' motion to dismiss paragraphs 51 through 56 in support of Count IV
(Plaintiffs subsequent First Amendment retaliation claim) and Count IV itself is

DENIED.