Lakkis v. Lahovski et al
Filing
55
ORDER 1. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 41) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. a. Count I (Plaintiffs First Amendment retaliation claim), Count II (constitutional challenge to Special Order Memorandum), and Count III (§ 1983 conspi racy), are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 2. Defendants' motion to dismiss paragraphs 51 through 56 in support of Count IV (Plaintiffs subsequent First Amendment retaliation claim) and Count IV itself is DENIED.Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 1/30/14. (jfg)
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
PETER LAKKIS
Plaintiff
v.
3:12·CV·1024
(JUDGE MARIANI)
FREDERICK LAHOVSKI and
JOECHACKE
Defendants
ORDER
AND NOW, THIS 30 TH DAY OF JANUARY 2014, upon consideration of
Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 41) and all accompanying briefs, IT IS HEREBY
ORDERED THAT:
1. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 41) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN
PART.
a. Count I (Plaintiffs First Amendment retaliation claim), Count II (constitutional
challenge to Special Order Memorandum), and Count III (§ 1983 conspiracy),
are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
2. Defendants' motion to dismiss paragraphs 51 through 56 in support of Count IV
(Plaintiffs subsequent First Amendment retaliation claim) and Count IV itself is
DENIED.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?