Santanna v. Delaware and Hudson Railway Company, Inc.

Filing 34

ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry), DENYING dft's 20 MOTION in Limine to Preclude Testimony of Plaintiff's Experts., and 22 MOTION in Limine to Exclude Evidence of Alleged Injuries Sustained Prior to 1991.Signed by Honorable James M. Munley on 2/18/14. (sm) (Main Document 34 replaced on 2/18/2014) (sm).

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ERMOND SANTANNA, Plaintiff : No. 3:12cv1240 : : (Judge Munley) v. : : DELAWARE AND HUDSON : RAILWAY COMPANY INC. d/b/a : CP RAIL SYSTEMS, : Defendant : :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ORDER AND NOW, to wit, this 18th day of February 2014, the defendant’s motions in limine are hereby DENIED as follows: 1) Defendant’s motion in limine to preclude testimony of plaintiff’s experts (Doc. 20) is hereby DENIED. 2) Defendant’s motion in limine to exclude evidence of plaintiff’s alleged injuries sustained prior to 1991 (Doc. 22) is hereby DENIED. BY THE COURT: s/ James M. Munley JUDGE JAMES M. MUNLEY United States District Court

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?