Njos v. Bureau of Prisons

Filing 176

ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry). 1. Plaintiffs motion for counsel (Doc. 145) is denied without prejudice. 2. Plaintiffs motion to strike Defendants brief in opposition to his motion for partial summary judgment (Doc. 138 ) is denied. 3. Plaintiffs objection to the Magistrate Judges order of August 8, 2014 (Doc. 107) is construed to be a motion for reconsideration, and is denied without prejudice. 4. Plaintiffs motion for a mental status examination (Doc. 122) is den ied. 5. Plaintiffs motion for leave to file a joint brief (Doc. 135) is granted to the extent that the Clerk of Court shall also docket Document 127 as Plaintiffs brief in reply to Defendants brief in opposition to his motion for partial summary jud gment (Doc. 103.) 6. Plaintiffs motion for injunctive relief (Doc. 167) is denied. 7. Defendants motion for a protective order (Doc. 163) is granted only to the extent that within thirty (30) days from the date of this order, the parties shall each file a status report with the court outlining any outstanding unresolved discovery issues in accordance with the attached Memorandum. 8. The Clerk of Court is directed to correct the docket to reflect that Plaintiffs filing entitled Motion Regarding Sufficiency of Answer and Objection (Doc. 147) is a motion to compel. 9. Plaintiffs motion for relief/adjudication (Doc. 172) is denied as moot. 10. All remaining motions on the docket (Docs. 103, 109, 115, 124, 147, 150) are stayed pending receipt of the discovery status reports.Signed by Honorable Edwin M. Kosik on 3/30/2015. (bg)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

SCOTT NJOS,
Plaintiff
v.
BUREAU OF PRISONS,
Defendant

:
:
:
:
: CIVIL NO. 3:CV-12-1251
:
: (Judge Kosik)
:
:

ORDER
AND NOW, THIS 30th DAY OF MARCH, 2015, in accordance with the
accompanying Memorandum, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AS FOLLOWS:
1.

Plaintiff’s motion for counsel (Doc. 145) is denied without prejudice.

2.

Plaintiff’s motion to strike Defendant’s brief in opposition to his motion for
partial summary judgment (Doc. 138) is denied.

3.

Plaintiff’s objection to the Magistrate Judge’s order of August 8, 2014 (Doc.
107) is construed to be a motion for reconsideration, and is denied without
prejudice.

4.

Plaintiff’s motion for a mental status examination (Doc. 122) is denied.

5.

Plaintiff’s motion for leave to file a joint brief (Doc. 135) is granted to the
extent that the Clerk of Court shall also docket Document 127 as Plaintiff’s
brief in reply to Defendant’s brief in opposition to his motion for partial
summary judgment (Doc. 103.)

6.

Plaintiff’s motion for injunctive relief (Doc. 167) is denied.

7.

Defendant’s motion for a protective order (Doc. 163) is granted only to the

extent that within thirty (30) days from the date of this order, the parties shall
each file a status report with the court outlining any outstanding unresolved
discovery issues in accordance with the attached Memorandum.
8.

The Clerk of Court is directed to correct the docket to reflect that Plaintiff’s
filing entitled “Motion Regarding Sufficiency of Answer and Objection” (Doc.
147) is a motion to compel.

9.

Plaintiff’s motion for relief/adjudication (Doc. 172) is denied as moot.

10.

All remaining motions on the docket (Docs. 103, 109, 115, 124, 147, 150) are
stayed pending receipt of the discovery status reports.

s/Edwin M. Kosik
EDWIN M. KOSIK
United States District Judge

2