Njos v. Bureau of Prisons

Filing 286

ORDER: denying without prejudice 109 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment; adopting 232 Report and Recommendation; denying 240 Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration; adopting 242 Report and Recommendation; denying 259 Pla intiff's Motion to Certify Non-Final Order for Interlocutory Appeal; adopting 262 Report and Recommendation; adopting 263 Report and Recommendation; denying 268 Plaintiffs Motion for Relief from an Order; adopting 270 Report and Recommendation; denying 257 Plaintiff's Motion to Recuse; and, referring action back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Edwin M. Kosik on 2/25/2016. (emksec, )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
________________________________
SCOTT NJOS,

:
:
Plaintiff,
:
:
v.
:
:
:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
:
:
Defendant.
________________________________ :

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:12-CV-1251

(Judge Kosik)

ORDER
AND NOW, THIS 25th DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2016, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED
THAT:
(1) The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson
filed on September 28, 2015 (Doc. 232) is ADOPTED;
(2) The Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 109) is DENIED
without prejudice;
(3) The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson
filed on October 6, 2015 (Doc. 242) is ADOPTED;
(4) The Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration (Doc. 240) is DENIED;
(5) The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson
filed on October 27, 2015 (Doc. 262) is ADOPTED;
(6) The Plaintiff’s Motion to Recuse (Doc. 257) is DENIED;
(7) The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson
filed on October 27, 2015 (Doc. 263) is ADOPTED;
(8) The Plaintiff’s Motion to Certify Non-Final Order for Interlocutory Appeal
(Doc. 259) is DENIED;
(9) The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson
filed on November 9, 2015 (Doc. 270) is ADOPTED;

(10) The Plaintiff’s Motion for Relief from an Order (Doc. 268) is DENIED; and,
(11) The above-captioned action is REFERRED back to the Magistrate Judge
for further proceedings.

s/Edwin M. Kosik
Edwin M. Kosik
United States District Judge