Botey v. Green et al
Filing 289
ORDER 1. Plaintiffs Motion to Preclude Inadmissible Lay Opinion Testimony (Doc. 181) is ruled on as follows: a. Whether Sanghera and Strauss will be precluded from offering opinion testimony as to fault for the accident at issue is RESERVED UNTIL TIM E OF TRIAL. b. Whether Strauss will be precluded from offering opinion testimony as to the speed of Plaintiffs vehicle is RESERVED UNTIL TIME OF TRIAL. c. To the extent that Plaintiff's motion requests that Strauss be precluded from testifying a s to why he believes the accident occurred, the motion is DENIED. d. Plaintiffs request that Strauss be precluded from testifying as to how long Green's tractor-trailer was on the roadway prior to impact is DENIED. 2. Plaintiffs Motion to Preclude the Testimony and Opinions of Defendants' Expert Steven W. Rickard (Doc. 193) is DENIED.Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 6/8/17. (jfg)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.