Sloan v. Chambers et al

Filing 124

ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry). (1) The Motion to Dismiss 109 filed by Defendant Sheila McGinnis is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. (2) The following claims against Defendant McGinnis are DISMISSED with prejudice: (a) Eighth Amendment denial of prescription eye glasses; (b) Eighth Amendment failure to provide meal accommodations; (c) First Amendment retaliation; and (d) Conspiracy. (3) Plaintiff Aaron Sloans only remaining claim against Defendant McGinnis is for the alleged violation of the Eighth Amendment relating to her refusal to treat his chronic abdominal pain. Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 10/18/18. (dw)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
AARON SLOAN,
Plaintiff,

NO. 3:12-CV-1954

v.

(JUDGE CAPUTO)

CHRISTOPHER CHAMBERS, et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER
NOW, this 18th day of October, 2018, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
(1)

The Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 109) filed by Defendant Sheila McGinnis
is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.

(2)

The following claims against Defendant McGinnis are DISMISSED with
prejudice:
(a)
(b)

Eighth Amendment failure to provide meal accommodations;

(c)

First Amendment retaliation; and

(d)
(3)

Eighth Amendment denial of prescription eye glasses;

Conspiracy.

Plaintiff Aaron Sloan’s only remaining claim against Defendant McGinnis
is for the alleged violation of the Eighth Amendment relating to her
refusal to treat his chronic abdominal pain.
/s/ A. Richard Caputo
A. Richard Caputo
United States District Judge