Doe v. Old Forge Borough et al

Filing 387

ORDER 1.The Court will DEFER ruling on Plaintiff's Motion in Limine to Bar Defendants' Counsel from Asking Scandalous and Impertinent Questions for which there is no Evidentiary Support (Doc. 251). 2. The Court will DEFER ruling on Plaintif f's Motion in Limine to Preclude the Use of Consent as Either a Defense, or a Mitigating Factor, to the Counts Alleged (Doc. 253). 3. The Court will DEFER ruling on Plaintiff's Motion in Limine to Allow Plaintiff to Reference Post-Incident Conduct (Doc. 255). 4. Plaintiffs Motion in Limine for the Court to Take Judicial Notice of a 2012 Pennsylvania Uniform Crime Reporting System Statistic (Doc. 261) is DENIED WITH PREJUDICE. 5. Plaintiffs Motion in Limine that Plaintiff is Entitled to an Adverse Inference Arising from Old Forge Hose and Engine's Failure to Produce Records that Old Forge Hose and Engine Asserts Went Missing (Doc. 264) is DENIED WITH PREJUDICE.Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 1/26/17. (jfg)

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

NASTASHA BURDYN

Plaintiff,

v.

3:12·CV·2236
(JUDGE MARIANI)

OLD FORGE BOROUGH, et al.
Defendants.
ORDER
AND NOW, THIS

2(,lh

DAY OF JANUARY, 2017, upon consideration of the

Motions in Limine filed by Plaintiff Burdyn, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1. The Court will DEFER ruling on Plaintiff's Motion in Limine to Bar Defendants'
Counsel from Asking Scandalous and Impertinent Questions for which there is no
Evidentiary Support (Doc. 251).
2. The Court will DEFER ruling on Plaintiff's Motion in Limine to Preclude the Use of
Consent as Either a Defense, or a Mitigating Factor, to the Counts Alleged (Doc.
253).
3. The Court will DEFER ruling on Plaintiff's Motion in Limine to Allow Plaintiff to
Reference Post-Incident Conduct (Doc. 255).

4. Plaintiffs Motion in Limine for the Court to Take Judicial Notice of a 2012
Pennsylvania Uniform Crime Reporting System Statistic (Doc. 261) is DENIED

WITH PREJUDICE.
5. Plaintiffs Motion in Limine that Plaintiff is Entitled to an Adverse Inference Arising
from Old Forge Hose and Engine's Failure to Produce Records that Old Forge
Hose and Engine Asserts Went Missing (Doc. 264) is DENIED WITH PREJUDICE.

R bert D. Mariani
United States District Judge

2