Doe v. Old Forge Borough et al

Filing 389

ORDER 1. OFHE's Motion in Limine to Preclude Lay Witnesses from Testifying Regarding f ~ Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Symptoms, Diagnosis, or Treatment (Doc. 239) is DEFERRED. 2. OFHE's Motion in Limine to Exclude Duplicative or Cumulative Testimony from Plaintiffs Disclosed Expert Witnesses (Doc. 242) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 3. OFHE's Motion in Limine to Exclude Hindsight Evidence and Arguments (Doc. 245) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 4. OFHE's Motion in Limine to Exclu de Evidence of Claimed Emotional Distress and/or Damages Caused by Litigation and/or the Legal Process and to Preclude Plaintiffs Recovery of the Same (Doc. 247) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Plaintiff will not be permitted to offer evidence of emotional distress or recover damages for the emotional distress brought about by her institution and involvement in the current action. Subject to laying the proper foundation and compliance with the Federal Rules of Evidence and this Court's other rulings, Plaintiff may present evidence of emotional distress as aresult of her involvement in the criminal proceedings and attempt to recover damages therefor.Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 1/26/17. (jfg)

Download PDF
I ~ I f r t THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ~ f NASTASHA BURDYN I f Plaintiff, v. 3:12·CV·2236 f (JUDGE MARIANI) I OLD FORGE BOROUGH, et al. r r Defendants. - AND NOW, THIS t ORDER dIt~ DAY OF JANUARY, 2017, upon consideration of the Motions in Limine filed by Defendant Old Forge Hose & Engine Company ("OFHE"), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: ! I I I r l ~ 1. OFHE's Motion in Limine to Preclude Lay Witnesses from Testifying Regarding f f Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Symptoms, Diagnosis, or Treatment (Doc. 239) is DEFERRED. 2. OFHE's Motion in Limine to Exclude Duplicative or Cumulative Testimony from Plaintiffs Disclosed Expert Witnesses (Doc. 242) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 3. OFHE's Motion in Limine to Exclude Hindsight Evidence and Arguments (Doc. 245) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. ~ i I t r I 4. OFHE's Motion in Limine to Exclude Evidence of Claimed Emotional Distress and/or Damages Caused by Litigation and/or the Legal Process and to Preclude Plaintiffs Recovery of the Same (Doc. 247) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Plaintiff will not be permitted to offer evidence of emotional distress or recover damages for the emotional distress brought about by her institution and involvement in the current action. Subject to laying the proper foundation and compliance with the Federal Rules of Evidence and this Court's other rulings, Plaintiff may present evidence of emotional distress as a result of her involvement in the criminal proceedings and attempt to recover damages therefor. . 2 /

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?