Seamans et al v. Tramontana et al

Filing 27

ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry). 1)Defendants motions for a more definitive statement are DENIED.2)Defendants motions to strike are DENIED.3)Defendants Andrew Tramontanas and Universal Technical Institute of Arizonas moti ons to dismiss are DENIED.4)Defendant EAN Holdings motion to dismiss is GRANTED IN PART as to any claim for punitive damages arising through vicarious liability for Defendant Tramontanas actions and DENIED IN PART as to direct liability for punitive damages by entrusting a motor vehicle to Defendant Tramontana. Signed by Honorable Malachy E Mannion on 10/22/13. (bs)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Sandra and Fred Seamans,
Plaintiffs
v.
Andrew B. Tramontana, et. al.
Defendants

:
:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:13-0698
(JUDGE MANNION)

ORDER
For the reasons discussed in the foregoing memorandum issued this
same day, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1)

Defendants’ motions for a more definitive statement are
DENIED.

2)

Defendants’ motions to strike are DENIED.

3)

Defendants Andrew Tramontana’s and Universal Technical
Institute of Arizona’s motions to dismiss are DENIED.

4)

Defendant EAN Holdings’ motion to dismiss is GRANTED IN
PART as to any claim for punitive damages arising through
vicarious liability for Defendant Tramontana’s actions and
DENIED IN PART as to direct liability for punitive damages by
entrusting a motor vehicle to Defendant Tramontana.

s/ Malachy E. Mannion
MALACHY E. MANNION
United States District Judge
DATED: October 22, 2013
O:\Mannion\shared\MEMORANDA - DJ\2013 MEMORANDA\13-0698-01-ORDER.wpd