Valley Rod & Gun Club v. Chesapeake Appalachia, L.L.C. et al
Filing
20
ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:(1)Defendant Chesapeake Appalachia, LLCs Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Complaint (Doc. 4) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The motion to dismiss Count I of the Complaint is GRANTED. The motion is DENIED in all other respects.(2) Defendant Anadarko E&P Onshore LLC, formerly Anadarko E&P Company, LPs Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Complaint (Doc. 7) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The motion to dismiss Count I of the Complaint is GRANTED. The motion is DENIED in all other respects.(3)Count I of Plaintiff Valley Rod & Gun Clubs Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice. (4)Defendants shall file answers to the Complaint within twenty-one (21) days from the date of entry of this OrderSigned by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 6/3/13. (jam)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
VALLEY ROD & GUN CLUB,
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:CV-13-0725
Plaintiffs,
(JUDGE CAPUTO)
v.
CHESAPEAKE APPALACHIA, LLC ,
Defendant,
ANADARKO E&P COMPANY, LP and
STATOIL ONSHORE PROPERTIES,
INC.,
Co-Defendants.
ORDER
NOW, this 3rd day of June, 2013, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
(1)
Defendant Chesapeake Appalachia, LLC’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s
Complaint (Doc. 4) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The motion
to dismiss Count I of the Complaint is GRANTED. The motion is DENIED
in all other respects.
(2)
Defendant Anadarko E&P Onshore LLC, formerly Anadarko E&P
Company, LP’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint (Doc. 7) is
GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The motion to dismiss Count I of
the Complaint is GRANTED. The motion is DENIED in all other respects.
(3)
Count I of Plaintiff Valley Rod & Gun Club’s Complaint is DISMISSED with
prejudice.
(4)
Defendants shall file answers to the Complaint within twenty-one (21)
days from the date of entry of this Order.
/s/ A. Richard Caputo
A. Richard Caputo
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?