Valley Rod & Gun Club v. Chesapeake Appalachia, L.L.C. et al

Filing 20

ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:(1)Defendant Chesapeake Appalachia, LLCs Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Complaint (Doc. 4) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The motion to dismiss Count I of the Complaint is GRANTED. The motion is DENIED in all other respects.(2) Defendant Anadarko E&P Onshore LLC, formerly Anadarko E&P Company, LPs Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Complaint (Doc. 7) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The motion to dismiss Count I of the Complaint is GRANTED. The motion is DENIED in all other respects.(3)Count I of Plaintiff Valley Rod & Gun Clubs Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice. (4)Defendants shall file answers to the Complaint within twenty-one (21) days from the date of entry of this OrderSigned by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 6/3/13. (jam)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA VALLEY ROD & GUN CLUB, CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:CV-13-0725 Plaintiffs, (JUDGE CAPUTO) v. CHESAPEAKE APPALACHIA, LLC , Defendant, ANADARKO E&P COMPANY, LP and STATOIL ONSHORE PROPERTIES, INC., Co-Defendants. ORDER NOW, this 3rd day of June, 2013, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: (1) Defendant Chesapeake Appalachia, LLC’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint (Doc. 4) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The motion to dismiss Count I of the Complaint is GRANTED. The motion is DENIED in all other respects. (2) Defendant Anadarko E&P Onshore LLC, formerly Anadarko E&P Company, LP’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint (Doc. 7) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The motion to dismiss Count I of the Complaint is GRANTED. The motion is DENIED in all other respects. (3) Count I of Plaintiff Valley Rod & Gun Club’s Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice. (4) Defendants shall file answers to the Complaint within twenty-one (21) days from the date of entry of this Order. /s/ A. Richard Caputo A. Richard Caputo United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?