Herman et al v. Harman et al
Filing
74
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry), DENYING Motion 60 for reconsideration and 66 MOTION to Alter Judgment. Further Dft Harman's request for file Sur-Reply is DENIED 72 Signed by Honorable James M. Munley on 1/15/14. (sm)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
CURTIS M. HERMAN and AUSTIN
JAMES ASSOCIATES, INC.,
Plaintiffs
:
3:13cv1118
:
:
(Judge Munley)
:
v.
:
:
STEVEN J. HARMAN,
:
UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK
:
INDEMNIFICATION BOARD
:
MEMBERS: MICHAEL F.
:
CONSEDINE; E. CHRISTOPHER
:
ABRUZZO; W. MICHAEL SMITH;
:
E. BRUCE SHELLER; J. STEPHEN
:
HIEBER; LARRY T. MORTON;
:
NANCY MARICONDI and STEPHANIE :
C. WISSMAN, KERRY L. YOUNDT
:
and ICF INCORPORATED, LLC,
:
Defendants
:
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
ORDER
AND NOW, to wit, this 15th day of January 2014, plaintiffs’ motion
for reconsideration (Doc. 60) and motion to alter or amend a judgment
(Doc. 66) are hereby DENIED. It is further ordered that Defendant
Harman’s request to file a Sur-Reply (Doc. 72) is DENIED.
BY THE COURT:
s/ James M. Munley
JUDGE JAMES M. MUNLEY
United States District Court
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?