Herman et al v. Harman et al

Filing 74

ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry), DENYING Motion 60 for reconsideration and 66 MOTION to Alter Judgment. Further Dft Harman's request for file Sur-Reply is DENIED 72 Signed by Honorable James M. Munley on 1/15/14. (sm)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CURTIS M. HERMAN and AUSTIN JAMES ASSOCIATES, INC., Plaintiffs : 3:13cv1118 : : (Judge Munley) : v. : : STEVEN J. HARMAN, : UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK : INDEMNIFICATION BOARD : MEMBERS: MICHAEL F. : CONSEDINE; E. CHRISTOPHER : ABRUZZO; W. MICHAEL SMITH; : E. BRUCE SHELLER; J. STEPHEN : HIEBER; LARRY T. MORTON; : NANCY MARICONDI and STEPHANIE : C. WISSMAN, KERRY L. YOUNDT : and ICF INCORPORATED, LLC, : Defendants : ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ORDER AND NOW, to wit, this 15th day of January 2014, plaintiffs’ motion for reconsideration (Doc. 60) and motion to alter or amend a judgment (Doc. 66) are hereby DENIED. It is further ordered that Defendant Harman’s request to file a Sur-Reply (Doc. 72) is DENIED. BY THE COURT: s/ James M. Munley JUDGE JAMES M. MUNLEY United States District Court

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?