United Financial Casualty Company v. A.M. Skier Agency, Inc. et al

Filing 18

ORDER upon consideration of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 9) and all accompanying briefs, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. a. Defendants' motion to dismiss Count II (Plaintiffs Equitable Subrogation Claim) is DENIED.b. Defendants' motion to dismiss Count III (Plaintiffs Fraud Claim) is GRANTED. COllnt III is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 3/5/14. (jfg)

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
UNITED FINANCIAL CASUALTY
COMPANY

Plaintiff

v.

3:13·CV·1291
(JUDGE MARIANI)

A.M. SKIER AGENCY INC., et al.

Defendants.
ORDER
AND NOW,

THIS~ DAY OF MARCH, 2014, upon consideration of

Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 9) and all accompanying briefs, IT IS HEREBY
ORDERED THAT:
1. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART.
a. Defendants' motion to dismiss Count II (Plaintiffs Equitable Subrogation
Claim) is DENIED.
b. Defendants' motion to dismiss Count III (Plaintiffs Fraud Claim) is
GRANTED. COllnt III is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.