Lamac v. Westfall Township et al

Filing 101

ORDER 1. Plaintiffs Objections (Doc. 98) are OVERRULED. 2. Defendants' Objections, (Doc. 94), are OVERRULED. 3. The Report and Recommendation, (Doc. 92), is ADOPTED for the reasons stated both therein and in this Court's accompanying memora ndum opinion. 4. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED in its entirety with respect to the claims against Defendant Westfall Township, including Plaintiffs state law claims. 5. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED in its entirety with respect to the claims against Defendant Buchanan. 6. Judgment is entered IN FAVOR OF Defendant Westfall Township and AGAINST Plaintiff William Lamac. 7. A telephone scheduling conference SHALL BE CONDUCTED on Monday, July 25, 201 6, at 4:00 p.m. for purposes of scheduling this matter for trial. Counsel for the Plaintiff is responsible for arranging the call to Chambers at (570) 2075750 and all participants should be prepared to proceed before the undersigned is contacted. Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 7/20/16. (jfg)

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
WILLIAM LAMAC

I
\

Plaintiff,

v.

3:13·CV·1338
(JUDGE MARIANI)

LESTER BUCHANAN, and
WESTFALL TOWNSHIP
Defendants.

ORDER

AND NOW, THIS

f

~AY OF JULY, 2016, upon de novo review of Magistrate

Judge Carlson's Report and Recommendation, (Doc. 92), the parties Objections thereto,
and all related filings, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1. Plaintiffs Objections (Doc. 98) are OVERRULED
2. Defendants' Objections, (Doc. 94), are OVERRULED
3. The Report and Recommendation, (Doc. 92), is ADOPTED for the reasons
stated both therein and in this Court's accompanying memorandum opinion.
4. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED in its entirety with
respect to the claims against Defendant Westfall Township, including Plaintiffs
state law claims.

I
l

5. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED in its entirety with respect
{

to the claims against Defendant Buchanan.
6. Judgment is entered IN FAVOR OF Defendant Westfall Township and AGAINST
Plaintiff William Lamac.
7. A telephone scheduling conference SHALL BE CONDUCTED on Monday, July
25, 2016, at 4:00 p.m. for purposes of scheduling this matter for trial. Counsel

for the Plaintiff is responsible for arranging the call to Chambers at (570) 207­
5750 and all participants should be prepared to proceed before the undersigned
is contacted.

Robert D. Mariani
United States District Judge

2