Rouse v. PA Department of Corrections/SCI-Retreat et al

Filing 69

ORDER 1. The claims against the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections are DISMISSED. The Pennsylvania Department of Corrections is DISMISSED as a party to this action. 2. The motion for judgment on the pleadings, (Doc. 64) is GRANTED. Judgment is en tered in favor of Defendants Sweeney and Keefer, and against Plaintiff, Calvin Rouse. 3. All other pending motions are DISMISSED. (Doc. 59). 4. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case. 5. Any appeal taken from this Order will be deemed frivolous, without probable cause, and not taken in good faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 1/4/16. (jfg)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

CALVIN ROUSE,

Plaintiff,

3: 13-cv-1808

v.

(Judge Mariani)

PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS, et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER

"f;, day of January, 2016, for the reasons set forth in the

AND NOW, this '-f;

Memorandum of this date, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1.

The claims against the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections are
DISMISSED. The Pennsylvania Department of Corrections is DISMISSED as
a party to this action.

2.

The motion for judgment on the pleadings, (Doc. 64) is GRANTED.
Judgment is entered in favor of Defendants Sweeney and Keefer, and against
Plaintiff, Calvin Rouse.

3.

All other pending motions are DISMISSED. (Doc. 59).

4.

The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.

5.

Any appeal taken from this Order will be deemed frivolous, without probable
cause, and not taken in good faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).