KIMMEL v. PONTIAKOWSKI et al

Filing 41

ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry), DENYING WITHOUT prejudice 30 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Schneider National Carriers Inc., ZBIGNIEW PONTIAKOWSKI.Signed by Honorable James M. Munley on 06/26/14. (sm)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
DIANE KIMMEL,

:
No. 3:13cv2229
Plaintiff
:
:
(Judge Munley)
v.
:
:
ZBIGNIEW PONTIAKOWSKI and
:
SCHNEIDER NATIONAL CARRIERS, INC., :
Defendants
:
:
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
ORDER
AND NOW, to wit, this 26th day of June 2014, defendants’ motion
for summary judgment (Doc. 30) is DENIED without prejudice to
defendants filing a motion for an extension of time pursuant to Federal
Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b)(1)(B) within fourteen (14) days. Defendants’
motion for an extension of time must address excusable neglect. Pioneer
Inv. Servs. Co. v. Brunswick Assocs., 507 U.S. 380, 395 (1993); Drippe v.
Tobelinski, 604 F.3d 778, 784-85 (3d Cir. 2010).

BY THE COURT:

s/ James M. Munley
JUDGE JAMES M. MUNLEY
United States District Court