Reisinger v. Shucosky et al
Filing
16
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry), ORDER DISMISSING CASE (1)The report and recommendation of Judge Blewitt, (Doc. No. 14), is ADOPTED;(2)Plaintiffs motion for remand, (Doc. No. 7), is GRANTED;(3)The case is remanded to the Court of Common Pleas of Luzerne County;(4)Defendants pending motions to dismiss, (Doc. Nos. 3, 4), are DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction without prejudice to defendants filing equivalent motions in state court; and(5)The Clerk is directed to close the case.Signed by Honorable Malachy E Mannion on 2/6/14. (bs)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
JOSEPH R. REISINGER,
:
:
Plaintiff
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:13-2572
:
v.
:
MICHAEL SHUCOSKY and
DANIEL PILLETS,
Defendants
(MANNION, D.J.)
(BLEWITT, M.J.)
:
:
ORDER
In light of the memorandum issued this same day, IT IS HEREBY
ORDERED THAT:
(1)
The report and recommendation of Judge Blewitt, (Doc. No. 14),
is ADOPTED;
(2)
Plaintiff’s motion for remand, (Doc. No. 7), is GRANTED;
(3)
The case is remanded to the Court of Common Pleas of Luzerne
County;
(4)
Defendants’ pending motions to dismiss, (Doc. Nos. 3, 4), are
DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction without prejudice to
defendants filing equivalent motions in state court; and
(5)
The Clerk is directed to close the case.
s/ Malachy E. Mannion
MALACHY E. MANNION
United States District Judge
Date: February 6, 2014
O:\Mannion\shared\MEMORANDA - DJ\CIVIL MEMORANDA\2013 MEMORANDA\13-2572-01-order.wpd
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?