Kobrick v. Stevens et al
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) - it is hereby ORDERED that: Stevens motion (Doc. 100) is GRANTED as to Count 14 of the complaint (Doc. 1) but is DENIED in all other respects. Entry of judgment in accordance with paragra ph 1 is DEFERRED pending trial on the remaining claims sub judice. On or before Friday, September 15, 2017, the parties shall submit to the court a joint proposed pretrial and trial schedule. 100 Signed by Chief Judge Christopher C. Conner on 9/1/2017. SEE MEMORANDUM AND ORDER FOR DETAILS. (sc)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
MATTHEW STEVENS, LAKELAND
SCHOOL DISTRICT, WESTERN
WAYNE SCHOOL DISTRICT, DR.
THOMAS KAMEROSKI, ANDREW
FALONK, and PATRICK SHEEHAN,
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:13-CV-2865
(Chief Judge Conner)
AND NOW, this 1st day of September, 2017, upon consideration of the motion
(Doc. 100) for summary judgment filed by defendant Matthew Stevens (“Stevens”)
pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56, and for the reasons stated in the
accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:
Stevens’ motion (Doc. 100) is GRANTED as to Count 14 of the
complaint (Doc. 1) but is DENIED in all other respects.
Entry of judgment in accordance with paragraph 1 is DEFERRED
pending trial on the remaining claims sub judice.
The parties are directed to meet and confer, in consultation with
the undersigned’s courtroom deputy, with the goal of developing an
appropriate schedule for further proceedings. On or before Friday,
September 15, 2017, the parties shall submit to the court a joint
proposed pretrial and trial schedule, specifically identifying the
anticipated length of trial, or, in the event the parties are unable to
agree, shall submit individual proposed schedules for the court’s
/S/ CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER
Christopher C. Conner, Chief Judge
United States District Court
Middle District of Pennsylvania
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?