Bailey v. B.S. Quarries, Inc. et al

Filing 139

ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry), GRANTING pltf's motion re Dfts Bolles and Smith remaining as defendants; GRANTING pltf's motion re employer immunity; GRANTING Dft TNT Services Corp's motion re dismissal ; and DENYING all remaining aspects of both parties motions.Signed by Honorable James M. Munley on 03/31/16. (sm)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA PAULINE M. BAILEY, Administrator of the Estate of Wesley Sherwood, Jr., Plaintiff : No. 3:13cv3006 : : (Judge Munley) : : v. : : B.S. QUARRIES, INC.; DAMASCUS 535 : QUARRY AND STONE PRODUCTS, LLC.; : TNT ONE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; TNT : SERVICES CORP.; LIPPMANN : MILWAUKEE, INC.; LIPPMANN QUALITY : USED EQUIPMENT; VIRA CORPORATION : TIMOTHY SMITH; and/or THOMAS : BOLLES, : Defendants : :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ORDER AND NOW, to wit, this 31st day of March 2016, upon consideration of the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment (Docs. 105, 107, 109, 111, 116, 118), it is hereby ORDERED: 1. Plaintiff’s motion is GRANTED to the extent that we will pierce the corporate veil and hold that B.S. Quarries and Damascus 535 are alter egos for Thomas Bolles and Timothy Smith. Defendants Bolles and Smith will remain as defendants in their individual capacities. 2. Plaintiff’s motion is GRANTED to the extent that the B.S. Quarries Defendants are estopped from invoking employer immunity under Pennsylvania workers’ compensation law; 3. Defendant TNT Services Corp.’s motion is GRANTED. TNT Services is dismissed from this case; and 4. All remaining aspects of the parties’ motions are DENIED. BY THE COURT: s/ James M. Munley JUDGE JAMES M. MUNLEY United States District Court 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?